Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Sign in to follow this  
argentum

Holed 1847 Threepence - What's a good price for this coin?

Recommended Posts

Wow, count me impressed as the strike does not look like a worn Maundy. Look at areas on the numeral "3" and the border teeth - they look irregular like a currency strike. Do you have an obverse picture?

WAG (wild a-- guess) - 75-100 pounds, lean to the later. A Vicky silver person like me might go higher retail....Hint, hint....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, count me impressed as the strike does not look like a worn Maundy. Look at areas on the numeral "3" and the border teeth - they look irregular like a currency strike. Do you have an obverse picture?

WAG (wild a-- guess) - 75-100 pounds, lean to the later. A Vicky silver person like me might go higher retail....Hint, hint....

thanks for the reply

time for me to consider my options!

Here's the obverse:

http://i1018.photobucket.com/albums/af304/triple-agent/1847threepenceOB_zps7726aeff.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mine is in about the same condition, but without the hole, but I only paid about £10.00 for it some 7 years ago. Prices and demand have sharpened considerably since then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah,yes, the obverse is a bit haggard there. It is harder to tell if the obverse is Maundy but the reverse looks as best I can determin NOT to be and is on that basis impressive. The huge and vast bulk of 1846-48 specimens are Maundies that have been mucked about, some encapsulated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×