Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Sign in to follow this  
Danz

1927 Proof Shilling.

Recommended Posts

Hi all. Is there an easy way to tell a 1927 proof shilling from the ones issued for circulation. Cheers Dan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No! LOL!!

Is yours of the New Coinage variety or the older?

A proof should have sharper edges, milling and devices with at least (generally) a modicum of reflective surface to the fields. Often not much of a cameo effect though...

Post pictures if you can.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. Thanks for the reply. Here is a pic of the obv.

post-7160-0-25847000-1383944362_thumb.jp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And rev. Cheers Dan.

post-7160-0-26514400-1383944402_thumb.jp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like it has the usual weak-struck fleur on the crown, not what you'd expect from a proof! It doesn't leap out at me, Danz!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like it has the usual weak-struck fleur on the crown, not what you'd expect from a proof! It doesn't leap out at me, Danz!

Even the proof often does have that weak fleur de lys on the right hand side of the crown.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FWIW I think the edge and rim (from what I can see) are certainly good enough to be a proof, so are the teeth. That doesn't mean it actually is one, you understand, just that as far as I can see it COULD be one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like it has the usual weak-struck fleur on the crown, not what you'd expect from a proof! It doesn't leap out at me, Danz!

Even the proof often does have that weak fleur de lys on the right hand side of the crown.

Now that's something I wasn't expecting, something else I've learnt about G5 proofs!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some sharp edges on the milling in places but the obverse in particular is not compelling as a proof IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK Gents

We are chewing the fat on a 1927 proof/currency shilling.

What are your opinions on early strikes?

Where do these sit in your "must haves"?

Some of the George V copper is renowned for weak strikes.

I was wondering if anyone has conclusive evidence of an early strike.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK Gents

We are chewing the fat on a 1927 proof/currency shilling.

What are your opinions on early strikes?

Where do these sit in your "must haves"?

Some of the George V copper is renowned for weak strikes.

I was wondering if anyone has conclusive evidence of an early strike.

An early strike will often be prooflike on its main design and in the fields, especially if a proof die has been used for currency. One thing it won't have, however, is the proof's edge and rim, which are specially prepared in a separate part of the striking process for proofs. That's why the edges are so often the conclusive test for a proof.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×