Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Sign in to follow this  
colliewalker1

UNC or EF?

Recommended Posts

I find it hard to make up my mind as to the 'collectability' of UNC coins.They are undoubtedly very attractive and a benchmark against which to judge lesser graded coins.

On the other hand I can't help feeling that in a way UNC coins have something unsatisfying about them.There is a lack of 'romance' about them I think[ what sort of people had owned them and what did they buy with them] and that is an important factor in coin collecting - as I see it as a beginner anyway.

I am inclined to think that a GF or EF is a good compromise and the way to go genarally, there being little loss of quality compared with UNC - and of course they are less expensive. :rolleyes:

I only have one UNC coin in my embryonic collection - a 1937 Half Crown - a pretty unexciting item, but the date has a particular relevance for me: of course it looks brand new.

To take an unlikely and extreme example,it strikes me that a collection composed entirely of UNC coins, although pretty valuable if they are 'vintage/antique, would be boring!

I happen to be very interested in WW2 aircraft [although I don't actually collect them! :D ]- if two Spitfires, Lancasters or whatever, were on display - one had a history of action and showed signs of 'wear and tear'[ e.g. repaired battle damage] while the other had left the factory after the war had ended and looked immaculate , which would have the 'charisma'....?

I would be interested in the views of other members.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do agree with you, but only on the timescale that i said in your previous UNC post :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think GEF coins are usually nicer than UNC anyhow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think GEF coins are usually nicer than UNC anyhow.

On UNC coins the toning never mixes with the little lustre that remains (on older than 1900 coins) i think :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

EF coins are nice, so are UNC coins. Collect what you can afford and whatever you like the look of.

The WWII plane thing is all very well, being a bigger far more complex object with so much more importance and relevence than a coin, it's only right that one with bullet holes and battle damage would have a more interesting history than a new one. (Although I do have a Double florin with bullet damage!)

I think that each UNC coin that has not been spent despite the massive temptation is a small miracle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×