Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Sign in to follow this  
RLC35

Odd Color of Copper Penny

Recommended Posts

I have a 1844 Penny that has a really odd coloration, it is more of a Red / Orange coloration, than the normal Copper Color of the YH series. Does anyone have any idea what might of caused this different color. I thought maybe it might have been plated or something...is that a possibility? The color of the coin, is even more Red / Orange than the pic's show. NGC wouldn't slab it because they said it had a altered surface, but as you probably know, NGC is wrong a lot of the times, with English Coins...

post-509-0-06385500-1425138918_thumb.jpgpost-509-0-44539200-1425138942_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks too even for lustre, perhaps an attempt at falsely applying lustre to a toned coin?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks too even for lustre, perhaps an attempt at falsely applying lustre to a toned coin?

I should have also noted Colin...it has a Matt like finish, no luster. It is a very attractive coin, it just has a odd coloration...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you tried a little bit of acetone on a Q-tip to a small area? I bought a coin once, which had nice black toning in and around the letters...not after I'd acetoned it and found it to be some kind of paint or other! :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting piece, the caveat as always is that it is best seen in hand. I have seen similar that apparently were cleaned & thereby stripped down to raw copper alloy, then retoned in an envelope with then "retoning" on the high points of devices and rim. I still, however, can not totally rule out original surfaces with differential toning. Lustre is a tricky thing and does not IMO always appear stereotypically.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I must admit I can't add much to the topic.

Nice coin though.

Is there something going on with the 'R' in Victoria ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I must admit I can't add much to the topic.

Nice coin though.

Is there something going on with the 'R' in Victoria ?

The "R" along with some of the other letters, have light dirt around them....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

okay thanks. Half looked like 'R' over 'B' or something ....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

okay thanks. Half looked like 'R' over 'B' or something ....

Agree, though, it does have that look about it in the pics!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Penny1949_zpsrxzinx39.jpg

Penny 1949

George VI

That Penny has a blue toning at the reverse only

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

nSYxhVY.jpg

I would agree with NGC for the following reasons

a) Looking at Britannia's left tit you can see some wear and on top of this wear there is a coating of colour (artificial shine?). Now if the coin were to wear it would have taken the luster off first. The fact that on top of the luster there is wear is suspecious

B) There are some minor scratches/hairlines as I have shown in the circled areas. The area around the leg is particularly interesting. These scratches again have luster which fills the crevices. Only rarely would we see such a degree of scratches on a platchet before it is struck. The fact that the coin had this level of scratches before the luster was applied makes me believe this luster was applied after the coin saw a bit of circulation.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah with that comment I have gone from being a "Regular participating member" to a "very familiar face". Doesn't surprise me considering I have been on this page almost daily (.... and spending considerable time on it) for the last 3 or 4 months :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah with that comment I have gone from being a "Regular participating member" to a "very familiar face". Doesn't surprise me considering I have been on this page almost daily (.... and spending considerable time on it) for the last 3 or 4 months :)

It won't be long before you're "Almost a piece of furniture", or something like that. :rolleyes:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I must add the obverse looks fine to me and it is a nice coin.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah with that comment I have gone from being a "Regular participating member" to a "very familiar face". Doesn't surprise me considering I have been on this page almost daily (.... and spending considerable time on it) for the last 3 or 4 months :)

It won't be long before you're "Almost a piece of furniture", or something like that. :rolleyes:

Is that when the forum gods take turns to buy me beers ;) ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NOT SURE WHATS GONE ON HERE - BUT STILL A LOVELY COIN

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×