Nutsaboutcoins Posted July 20, 2015 Posted July 20, 2015 I have been reading up on some die varieties and combinations and I’m wondering if there is a recognised way of recording these.I have seen some references that record obverse varieties as capital letters A, B, C etc. with reverse dies recorded with lower case letters a, b, c etc. giving combinations a structure of A-a, A-b, B-b etc.Others use letters for the obverse & numbers for the reverse die varieties, resulting in combinations of A-1, A- 2, B-2 etc. Is there a right way of doing this, or does anything go? Or is one system from the UK and the other wrong from the US? Quote
Rob Posted July 20, 2015 Posted July 20, 2015 It doesn't matter as long as you identify what convention you use and are consistent in its use. Quote
TomGoodheart Posted July 20, 2015 Posted July 20, 2015 (edited) I don't believe there's a 'right' and 'wrong'. Classification systems just seem to gain popularity or not. I think the key thing is that the system needs to be simple. But not too simple! For example, Spink numbers for earlier coins often include a wide variety of different styles. 24 numbers encompass the over 30 obverse designs and around 20 reverses of the Charles I Tower mint shilling issues. Roy Osborne came up with a system for more precisely classifying these shillings but while a terrific piece of numismatic research, to know what Os 69/85 will look like requires a jolly good memory or constant access to his paper. Whereas Michael Sharp just followed North's convention of naming types of shillings (based on bust design) from Group A-G, expanded it to include a new group H then numbered the obverse and reverse designs. So Os 69/85 is Sharp E5/2 ... E tells me the general appearance of the bust, 5 that it's the fifth bust design with the 2nd variety of reverse. ... Rather simpler to my mind as there are only a maximum of 7 obverses (paired with 2 reverses) or 5 reverses (paired with 3 obverses) within a particular group. Probably why most specialist shilling collectors use Sharp rather than Osborne. . Edited July 20, 2015 by TomGoodheart Quote
Nutsaboutcoins Posted July 20, 2015 Author Posted July 20, 2015 Thanks gents, both helpful and swift as always Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.